Can Walk Score Really "Walk the Walk"?

Two weeks ago, I blogged about a useful website - Walkscore.com.  This blog entry is a follow up to a recent article I read: "Walk Score Can't Walk the Walk", which cited insufficiencies to the website with it not being entirely accurate with the "walk score" it produces for a specific location.  The article talked specifically about Altanta, GA but I thought it was prudent to provide this piece to our readers so you are accurately informed about the website. 

Rarely would the Conservative Planner and James Howard Kunstler be able to see eye to eye. But such is the case when it comes to the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) and their interesting selection of Atlanta as the host city for their 2010 gathering.

The Conservative Planner attended several sessions, including one where a doctor associated with the National Institutes of Health raved on and on about Walkscore.com and how it should be applied by physicians when prescribing more activity to obese children and adults. This brought great internal chuckle, given the setting.

One only had to take a stroll around the Hilton in downtown Atlanta to see the inherent flaws in this online tool. Type the Hilton’s address in Walk Score (255 Courtland Street NE, Atlanta, GA) and it will tell you that it is a “86 – Walker’s Paradise” (now “86 – Very Walkable” due to recent changes and thanks to Human Transit).

Nevermind the fact there are 4- and 5-lane one-way streets with high speed traffic surrounding the hotel. Interstates 85/75 runs to the north and east of the hotel and is a major pedestrian barrier. The restaurants that are deemed by Walk Score to be nearby and within walking distance are buried within the Marriott and Hilton hotels, which are 1960s/1970s behemoths. It is hardly a walking paradise; it may be in a downtown area but the street system is strikingly suburban.

To read the entire article, click here.